|
|
|
|
From - Fri Aug 16 17:54:07 2002 Date: Fri, 16 Aug 2002 17:53:55 -0500 From: John <fishes@brainerd.net> To: Roy Johannes <roy.johannes@dnr.state.mn.us> CC: Ron Payer <ron.payer@dnr.state.mn.us>, Steven Morse <steven.morse@dnr.state.mn.us>, rep.dale.walz@house.leg.state.mn.us, sen.don.samuelson@senate.leg.state.mn.us Subject: Re: Transportation statute clarification request August 15, 2002
Mr. Johannes, Are you saying that the statement is incorrect when you say it is generally correct? That is the way I understand the statutes. Also, has anyone informed Mr. Goeman that his statement is incorrect? Sincerely, John Reynolds Midwest Fish and Crayfish
Roy Johannes wrote:
> Dear Mr. Reynolds: After further review of the January 8, 2002 letter sent to you by Mr. Goeman and the laws, the statement is generally correct. However, more detail is outlined in the email that was sent to you on August 5, 2002. I would like to note that the statutes do refer to both a transportation permit and a bill of lading. The transportation permit can be substituted in place of a bill of lading. If you have a more specific question, I would be happy to assist you. Sincerely, > > Roy J. Johannes Commercial Fisheries Program Consultant Phone 651-296-2308 Fax 651-297-4916 e-mail: roy.johannes@dnr.state.mn.us
|